Executive Compensation Planning: A Practical Guide to Designing and Protecting Executive Pay, Part 5: Employment Agreements, Severance, and Clawback Provisions
This series has covered equity compensation, deferred compensation, Section 409A compliance, and the Section 280G golden parachute rules. In this installment, we turn to the contractual framework that governs the executive relationship from hiring through departure: employment agreements, severance design, and the Dodd-Frank clawback requirements that now apply to all listed companies.
A well-negotiated employment agreement protects both parties. For the executive, it defines the circumstances under which severance is payable and the protections that apply upon a change in control. For the company, it establishes enforceable restrictive covenants and ensures that incentive compensation can be recovered if later determined to have been erroneously awarded.
The employment agreement is the contractual foundation of the executive compensation relationship. A well-drafted agreement defines not only the economics of employment (compensation, benefits, and equity) but the rules that govern departure. The definitions of “cause,” “good reason,” and “change in control” determine whether an executive receives a severance payment, how much, and when.
For the executive, the most important provisions are often those protecting against constructive termination: a “good reason” definition broad enough to cover material reductions in compensation, duties, or authority; relocation requirements; changes in reporting structure; or a successor company's refusal to assume the agreement. “Double-trigger” equity acceleration requires both a change in control and a qualifying termination before equity accelerates, and is now standard in well-negotiated agreements.
For the employer, the employment agreement is a risk management tool. Meaningful restrictive covenants protect the company's competitive position after the executive's departure. Clawback language tied to the company's Dodd-Frank policy ensures that erroneously paid incentive compensation can be recovered. And thoughtful severance design ensures that exit packages reward legitimate service, not simply the act of leaving.
Restrictive Covenants
Non-competition, non-solicitation, and confidentiality provisions are standard in executive employment agreements. Enforceability varies significantly by jurisdiction; some states, including California, generally prohibit post-employment non-competes. Nevertheless, well-drafted provisions remain essential to protecting the company’s competitive position. The scope, duration, and geographic reach of restrictive covenants should be tailored to the executive’s role and access to confidential information. Overly broad restrictions risk being struck down entirely; appropriately tailored ones are more likely to be enforced.
Severance Design Considerations
Severance multiples, typically expressed as a multiple of base salary or base salary plus target bonus, vary by executive level, industry, and market conditions. A well-designed severance arrangement balances the executive’s need for income protection against the company’s interest in controlling separation costs. Key design elements include the definition of qualifying termination events, treatment of prorated bonuses, continuation of health benefits, and any acceleration of unvested equity. The agreement should also address the timing of payments in light of Section 409A’s six-month delay requirement for specified employees of public companies.
SEC Rule 10D-1 requires all listed companies to maintain written clawback policies providing for the recovery of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation following a financial restatement. The rule applies to all current and former executive officers, covers incentive compensation received during the three fiscal years preceding the restatement, and requires recovery of the excess over what would have been earned based on corrected financials, regardless of whether the executive was at fault.
Clawback exposure is now a material factor in negotiating and accepting executive compensation. Executives should understand the scope of the company's policy before accepting performance-based awards. Compensation committees should document their rationale for awards carefully and align performance metrics with audited financial results.
Final Installment Next: Part 6 brings together the practical takeaways from this series, the action items that companies and executives should prioritize in executive compensation planning.
DISCLAIMER: This summary is not legal advice and does not create any attorney-client relationship. This summary does not provide a definitive legal opinion for any factual situation. Before the firm can provide legal advice or opinion to any person or entity, the specific facts at issue must be reviewed by the firm. Before an attorney-client relationship is formed, the firm must have a signed engagement letter with a client setting forth the Firm’s scope and terms of representation. The information contained herein is based upon the law at the time of publication.